Avaerilon
Member State
The Royal Cartographer, Peritus Scriptor Litterarum
Former Delegate, Minister of DA and Registrar of the Court
Posts: 6,518
|
Post by Avaerilon on Oct 22, 2011 21:54:24 GMT
Hi Everyone,
It may not be massively important and it may never come up in any major posts. But what would be interesting to know is:
What are the exchange rates of currencies in the SLU?
To do this, we'll need plenty of info from as many people as possible. If anyone here is good with maths or economics and could lead this, please tell everyone! Otherwise I'll look at some "Beginners' Guide to Exchange Rates" on the web.
Please let me know some key points:
1. Your currency 2. Your average economic score (what is appears to be the most often) 3. Your current score 4. Your main industry (if any) 5. Your principal exports to other SLU members
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 22, 2011 23:54:46 GMT
The idea does seem interesting. It could be compared with a standard currency or item and that comparison can allow for conversion to other currencies. Example (if it makes any sense): Right now, NAR's economic score is at 50 / 100. For the sake of this example, let's use the USD. $ = USD N = NARB 1.00 / (50.0 / 100 ) =N2.00 In this case $1.00 = N2.00 ----------------------------------------------- Currency value would be calculated with: 1 / ("economic score") = Value versus the $ where "economic score" is the value shown in it's entirety (X / 100) ---------------------------------------------- Nations would have to, by the end of the week, report their current score and that score would be inputted into the above equation. Then the equivalent exchange rate could be determined between nations (If the currency is dynamic). Otherwise, whatever the general trend seems to be would be acceptable and the rates would stay the same. ---------------------------------------------- Hope I helped. PS I decided to Google the exact phrase Avaerilon used and found an About page that shows the general idea of what I had typed, available here. PPS *As of this post **Letters designate a fake currency character to each nation $1 = N2 North American Republics $1 = E1.47 Eggy216 $1 = A5.88 Avaerilon $1 = M3.70 Millyland $1 = P7.69 Peace Strivers $1 = G1.52 Islamic Guiana ------------------------------------------------ N2.00 = E1.47 } 1 North American Republics to N1.00 = E0.74 } X Eggy216 N2.00 = A5.88 } 1 North American Republics to N1.00 = A2.94 } X Avaerilon A5.88 = E1.47 } 1 Avaerilon to A1.00 = E0.25 } X Eggy216 M3.70 = P7.69 } 1 Millyland to M1.00 = P2.08 } X Peace Strivers
|
|
Avaerilon
Member State
The Royal Cartographer, Peritus Scriptor Litterarum
Former Delegate, Minister of DA and Registrar of the Court
Posts: 6,518
|
Post by Avaerilon on Oct 23, 2011 9:07:56 GMT
This is brilliant NAR! Thanks for going to the effort to do this :)
|
|
Avaerilon
Member State
The Royal Cartographer, Peritus Scriptor Litterarum
Former Delegate, Minister of DA and Registrar of the Court
Posts: 6,518
|
Post by Avaerilon on Oct 23, 2011 12:51:29 GMT
We should also try and factor-in the average economic score. Also, if we're going to use the US$ as a base, what would the current and average economic scores of the US be?
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 23, 2011 14:05:41 GMT
No problem. I don't think that it matters what we peg the value of our currency to, it would just be a point of comparison that we could use. Example:
1 ounce of gold = N2 1 Euro = N2 1 Yen = N2
If we wanted to we could create the SLU § and it would be worth the absolute maximum one could reach. No currency could go over the value of the SLU § ergo the economic score (X / 100) where the percentage is the economic worth of a maximum number.
|
|
Avaerilon
Member State
The Royal Cartographer, Peritus Scriptor Litterarum
Former Delegate, Minister of DA and Registrar of the Court
Posts: 6,518
|
Post by Avaerilon on Oct 23, 2011 20:27:18 GMT
Sounds like an excellent idea.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2011 21:40:12 GMT
Damn it - should've listened more to economics in school :-/
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Oct 23, 2011 21:54:54 GMT
This is great- thanks Avaerilon and NAR
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 23, 2011 22:31:55 GMT
This is all self-learned, I'm only 16 XD.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2011 23:29:58 GMT
As a suggestion, 100 shouldn't equal one US $. The US $ should be 50 or 60 so that our currencies could be worth more.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 23, 2011 23:30:33 GMT
Also, good job NAR. I never really liked economics.
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 24, 2011 23:01:17 GMT
I think that the following works, just don't quote me on it :).
-------------------------------------------------------------- 1.0 / (national percentage) = national currency per 1 USD
(national percentage) / 1.0 = USD per 1 national currency
^ | US = 100/100 -------------------------------------------------------------- 0.5 / (national percentage) = national currency per 1 USD
(national percentage) / 0.5 = USD per 1 national currency
^ | US = 50 /100 -------------------------------------------------------------- 0.6 / (national percentage) = national currency per 1 USD
(national percentage) / 0.6 = USD per 1 national currency
^ | US = 60 /100 -------------------------------------------------------------- General Formula (economic score as base) / (national percentage) = national currency per 1 whatever currency
(national percentage) / (economic score as base) = whatever currency per 1 national currency -------------------------------------------------------------- Hope it helps and I hope that a more experienced person comes around.
|
|
|
Post by Kingdom of Grolsch on Oct 25, 2011 19:44:56 GMT
As this is my first day here and my second day in NS, don't expect something perfect ;) However I will give this a shot, as dealing with this stuff is part of my job alongside university for 2 days a week.
NAR, your calculation is excellent. It is quite simple, but it works and over the long term your model reflects reality quite well.
One thing I would add to this discussion is the fact that the exchange rates of many countries in real life actually don't change that much due to the rate being set by the government or because the government sets a certain range in which market forces operate freely.
1. Fixed rates Usually governments of non-democratic forms of government use a so-called fixed exchange rate, meaning the exchange rate is totally fixed and the rate is decided by the government. How often a rate change is made depends a lot. Some countries have had the same rate for years while in other countries, the government sets a new rate once a day.
This system can be used easily, you would just say my currency x can be exchanged by your currency y for amount z. No market forces or calculation of any kind involved.
2. Semi-fixed rates Semi-fixed rates are rates which involve a combination of market forces and government intervention. In countries with a semi-fixed rate, governments permit the market to set the price of currency within a certain range. China is probably the best-known example of a country using this system nowadays.
A semi-fixed rate in NS could be a combination of, for example, NAR's calculation + or - a specific number to create a range (e.g. a band of 1.00 - 1.20). The exact rate could be a calculation or just an educated guess depending on recent events.
3. Floating rate The floating rate is (in theory) a currency rate fully decided by market forces. In most economies nowadays governments tend to intervene a lot in the markets so the fully floating rate is gone now, but for example USD-CHF or EUR-USD rates are decided primarily by market forces.
NAR's calculation could be used to calculate a floating rate. It is a simple system, but it does over the long term reflect significant changes in a country's economy.
4. Basket system In a basket system, a country's exchange rate depends on the value of other currencies and moves in the same direction. To make it even more difficult, this can be a fixed-rate or a floating-rate system. Some international organizations use a basket or a basket-like system, for example the IMF.
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 25, 2011 20:25:10 GMT
This is wonderful, thanks for coming on. What does everyone else think? What rate should we use?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 21:45:06 GMT
I like the semi-fixed rate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2011 22:24:42 GMT
To be honest, I haven't a bloody clue but it's fantastic that we have guys here who know what they're talking about! :-D
Grolsch - it's great to have you on board!
|
|
Avaerilon
Member State
The Royal Cartographer, Peritus Scriptor Litterarum
Former Delegate, Minister of DA and Registrar of the Court
Posts: 6,518
|
Post by Avaerilon on Oct 26, 2011 20:09:13 GMT
The semi-fixed is practical, as is the floating rate. I would personally prefer the semi-fixed one with regards to economic stability. Thanks to both Grolsch and the NAR for their obvious expertise and skill!
|
|
|
Post by Kingdom of Grolsch on Oct 26, 2011 21:37:11 GMT
First of all, thanks for the warm welcome. Much appreciated :)
Personally I'd go with a semi-fixed rate, as it is more practical for us. Going with a floating rate would mean we'd have to recalculate the rate each and every time and the differences, as opposed to the semi-fixed rate, can be very significant. Semi-fixed rates do change a lot as well though, but the changes aren't very significant so we can say to keep the same rate several days if we want to and then make an adjustment of, say, several percent.
Ok we have 3x semi-fixed now...NAR what do you think?
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Oct 26, 2011 22:25:30 GMT
Make it four.
|
|
|