Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2012 18:05:12 GMT
It struck me that we may soon have a diplomatic anomaly on our hands if the DRA comes into being as we hope and anticipate.
That being that we will be a part of a formal inter-regional alliance with a region with which we do not have normal embassy relations with at present - namely the DSAlliance.
The fact that the DSA seem on board with the project would signify to me that they must be willing for us to open up traditional dimplomatic channels with the Alliance.
As a result, as I have proposed before, can we not now make a formal request to the Alliance that we open up embassies with each other and then put it to a vote of our membership here in the Forum?
I am happy to proceed with such discussions with the Alliance with my puppet there as has been the case with the discussions over the DRA.
Do I have permission to make such official soundings?
|
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Jan 2, 2012 19:38:28 GMT
The Embassy Policy Act prohibits an embassy with the Democratic Socialist Alliance on the condition that "The Human Rights Activist of Cynthia McKinney maintains charter-endorsed power over its foreign affairs..." (Section1.3). The DSAlliance charter must be amended to remove power from the founder or the Embassy Policy Act's language must be changed to allow for an embassy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 2, 2012 21:14:19 GMT
It is no longer there, as I was... informed by the previous leader of the foreign affairs leader of the DSAlliance. The issue was the enemy of the DSAssembly issue, which has been taken care of
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2012 21:26:48 GMT
Aha, thanks for the clarification Azerzia. In which case, can I take soundings there in the DSAlliance?
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 2, 2012 21:29:01 GMT
I would inquire and send one over. All it needs is Gunir and Eggy's approval for it to be made
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 2, 2012 21:48:02 GMT
Ok so I best wait for the green light from Gunir and Eggy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Jan 2, 2012 22:43:40 GMT
Sounds good
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2012 22:41:43 GMT
Would this requir a vote?
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Jan 3, 2012 23:21:46 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 0:17:01 GMT
I would caution doing anything just yet Cemaes only because as I explained in the FA description, any more than two embassies for an ambassador really starts to strain the amount of time you can focus on each and still be a part of the SLU. Not to mention the work you do in the other ministries at the same time.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 0:24:29 GMT
Absolutely Gunir on which note I have been considering my Ambassadorial roles and would like to step down from my role with the Proletariat Coalition to spread the work load to new nations.
I would like to remain in post in the IDU and am happy to act as an envoy at present in the DSAlliance with my puppet which has been stationed there for some time and which has allowed me to view the RMB there regularly. This, if there is support for me to do so.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 21:35:42 GMT
Technically we need Eggy's approval, but it seems everyone is in support so I think he will support it too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 4, 2012 21:56:34 GMT
But I'll await Eggy's approval first.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 24, 2012 20:26:31 GMT
This seems like the logical place to but something I just saw: CMK is back
|
|
|
|
Post by North American Republics on Sept 24, 2012 20:38:17 GMT
No. No. NNNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:O
|
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Sept 24, 2012 20:48:23 GMT
In the Internationale....
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 24, 2012 20:48:44 GMT
She appears to be staying in the internationale though. That said, CMK can easily throw a wrench into the works on some kind of merger
|
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Sept 24, 2012 20:53:48 GMT
Doesn't seem like she'll have any legal power to stop it, but I doubt that would stop her from throwing a bitch fit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Sept 24, 2012 20:57:38 GMT
That is what I am worried about. She does still have some leeway over there, and the DSAssembly may be less inclined to merge if CMK gets anything
|
|
|
|
Post by Kingdom of Grolsch on Sept 26, 2012 18:18:55 GMT
Agreed. The Alliance is very inactive, their Delegate generally has stopped replying to my ambassadorial puppet´s TGs, including those containing a warning after a new state joined from a raider region.
|
|
