|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 16, 2012 20:28:22 GMT
Hey guys! Im happy to be running in the next election for speaker. First, thank you Millyland for the nomination. As for my position, I firstly would be less harsh on the ejects of nations as some did not meet but they didn't have the time some nationsdid. At the current time, im unable to continue so if you have any questions for me please post them here. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 19, 2012 4:37:08 GMT
To get the ball rolling on questions: Your main position above is a lessening the ejection response. What do you think of the current system, where states have about a week to make improvements, if a non-threat, or handled quickly if deemed a threat under the CUS system
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 20, 2012 20:38:05 GMT
If we go by a week, then we have been lax because some have 4 weeks. Some have come and were immediatly ejected in a week but didnt get to make a reply.
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 20, 2012 20:39:00 GMT
Nothing against you and Millyland.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2012 20:49:44 GMT
With all due respect Goncar, those non-member states that have been ejected by Azerzia on my recommendations have had a fair opportunity to mend their ways.
We could technically boot them straight away without contacting them but my 'Fair but Firm' policy has given them an opportunity to meet our entry requirements
Those that have not made improvements despite being proven to have been active and who have not given any mitigation for their circumstances, have been ejected after a 7 day grace period. Those that have been inactive in the meantime have had an additional 7 days grace (for a total of 14 days) to put their place in order.
Short of over-reacting in haste, I feel that we have bent over backwards in this way to give non-members a chance to become member nations.
Azerzia has not ejected any member states but I can't speak for that part of the regime as that falls under MoD and not Immigration.
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 20, 2012 21:52:07 GMT
Im sorry but The Greater Socailist Unions was a member state that got ejected 4 weeks after his TG from me
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2012 22:17:56 GMT
That was before I formulated the immigration policy and took over the TGing of non-member states.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2012 22:18:52 GMT
Also, The Greater Socialist Unions was never a member state - when I inherited the List of Nations as Minister of Immigation, The Greater Socialist Unions was in red making it a non-member state.
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 21, 2012 12:11:24 GMT
Hmmmmmm. Its funny that I had to TG him. Alright, off hostilities. I don't want to get in a argument with u Cemaes. Any other questions?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2012 13:44:17 GMT
Yeah. Can little narg come back? It's just for RP and some fun. You guys know that, right? Also, will you join the roleplay region?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kingdom of Grolsch on Mar 21, 2012 14:36:54 GMT
It can come back provided that it complies with the Constitution, i.e. average or higher freedoms.
|
|
|
|
Post by Administrator on Mar 21, 2012 15:09:40 GMT
Agreed with Grolsch. The Constitution does not recognize states just for roleplay purposes as being different than any other puppet state
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 21, 2012 16:20:24 GMT
Huh uh. And thats not something you should ask me. If you are going to ask that, talk to Millyland. No I wont join the Roleplay region, I have too many nations and they are all involved in their respective regions
|
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Mar 21, 2012 17:52:47 GMT
No, I believe Cemaes is the one to ask, as he deals with non-member states such as Little Narg.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2012 20:37:38 GMT
As Grolsch and Azerzia states, all nations must comply by the constitution. If they do, they are welcome to join the SLU.
Goncar, no worries :)
|
|
|
|
Post by Millyland on Mar 21, 2012 23:11:30 GMT
What do you believe differentiates yourself the most from the other candidate?
|
|
|
|
Post by Goncar on Mar 22, 2012 1:58:29 GMT
I have been currently more active than Michutopia and he prove to be unreliable in the future. I have also been in more elections than him so I know the process a little better. I doubt that helps anything though cuz it had nothing to do with Speaker.
|
|
